2 yr$ later: We will not hire vaxed people! No Vaxed Need Apply: "Don't Shed on Me" Control groups Rebel! SHEDDING LIVES!

While the government is going to allow the employers to force workers to take a vax... some entrepreneurs refuse to hire the vaxed instead. DID YOU HIRE OR FORCE A VAX?

It has been a couple of years and a change since I wrote that article and never hired, in fact, I mothballed all operations as the madness began and simply practiced social distancing to the extremes.

Now, in the Spring of 2023, we are getting the evidence that shedding of natural immunity to others is possible, just like sharing the virus, and

suppose one breathes out the natural immunity developed as a child would into the face of their grandparents. In that case, they will be more likely: as if being vaccinated naturally, of surviving more easily than if not exposed to the exosomes.

On the other hand… NOTE THIS PLEASE… if the exosomes are from a Spike protein, the mRNA-infected person will have the potential for death or much worse reactions to Covid, as well as other respiratory illnesses that may be encountered in the future.

Scarier still is the impact the spike proteins are showing to have on the brain, cancer, and other immune system reactions that are causing blood clotting and heart attacks.

If an employer allows known vaccinated people to be hired to work in close proximity where they can shed the vax exosomes on others, they can be held liable for a failure to prevent the transmission, or contrarily by forcing people to submit to the dangers by virtue of working at your business.

Does your insurance cover this when it raises its ugly head in the future, now that the evidence is hitting the news and public?

Legal issues will surely favor the injured over the small business that has people die over these decisions to follow mandates they did not have to follow by law or moral ethics that also call the Constitution into play.

Until the Supreme Court proves it to be a valid dictate, it is simply an order that is not constitutional to use an untested product that no one appears liable for misrepresenting due to a lack of testing.

Once enough people die due to complications and the evidence for future death tolls that dwarf cigarettes, asbestos, or any other poison cast into the world. This will be the biggest crime against humanity ever committed. Will anyone be punished?

It is doubtful because it goes to the top, and involves so much money, the DOD, CIA, and other shadow forms of governance, including the State Department that has an affinity for the 4th Reich it would seem, rather than true democracy.

The black boxes for elections will once more deem who will be the master puppet soon... but who believes that is the end or the beginning of a new act in the play on the stage? The curtains remain, the puppeteers unseen, and the lights are dimmed as the audience sits down to be entranced once more.

What will the final act bring?

THE REMAINDER WAS ORIGINAL IN 9/21:

Is it wrong for the world to turn into a vax passport, required for work, for restaurants, and for going to the places all people should have a right to go to as equal citizens? Does equality go out the window, thus discrimination is reborn in a new guise, the new discriminator in the social classes going to be the “Vax vs. Natural Immune”? Soon we are going to be forced to decide if our job is worth the risk of an injection that might not be pure, healthy, or desirable, yet forced upon those who have no other choice.

What about the employers that will not hire those who have been vaccinated? Realizing that the right to privacy is being taken away, medical privacy should allow one to not have to disclose but now: the rules are changed! You can force the disclosure of medical information before or after being hired, forced to take a vaccine to keep a job or if in the military services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and more), risk a dishonorable discharge over refusing to take the Jab, not just fired, but marked for life as a dishonorable person.

Will the government step in and stop employers who refuse to hire and will fire anyone who takes any of the unapproved vax jabs? Even if the vax is approved to use on humans though it might make your employees sick, kill them, or permanently disable them thus running your company insurance costs through the roof over a few vaxed employees, would employers be required to let them work anyway? Will they have to pay unemployment or health benefits when the employee gets fired for not showing up to work over the vax? Since the doctors, manufacturers, government all deny any liability or requirement to help pay for bad health, is it the job of small businesses who disagree, do not want the vaccine in them or their employees, do they not have the same right to discriminate as those employers requiring the vax.

This is the big question being ignored in the employment dialogue… oops, it is a narrative by the government and mass media, not educated healthy immune system people who do not want to take an experimental vax with known toxic material known as graphene oxide, which likes to settle in the ovaries within a week. This is not a good thing that will lead to some employers making the logical decision… risk is not worth the return.

Have you thought of this issue yet? If so, from the vax or no-vax perspective? So the very argument is one of the employer's rights as this is forced on much of the public thus costing them future jobs once the costs and ramifications of the complications become more exposed in media instead of hidden. Soon the exposure of the bad actors who are profiting from hurting the masses will result in significant changes in policy for hiring when the two groups do not want to work or be around each other due to the controversy. Who will decide this question that will affect these generations in this experimental period with complications that no solutions exist for based on those already suffering from the consequences, especially for kids?